Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Miss me?
Good night. Bye.
Monday, March 14, 2011
Earthquake---->Tsunami--->Nuclear leak.
A full explanation of nuclear power plants in Japan.
What in the hell is going on here?
In the aftermath of the recent earthquake and tsunami in Japan, two nuclear power stations on the east coast of Japan have been experiencing problems. They are the Fukushima Daiichi (“daiichi” means “number one”) and Fukushima Daini (“number two”) sites, operated by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (or TEPCO). Site one has six reactors, and site two has four. The problematic reactors have been #1 and #3 at site one, which are the oldest of the ten.
In short, the earthquake combined with the tsunami have impaired the cooling systems at these reactors, which has made it difficult for TEPCO to shut them down completely. Reactor #1 is now considered safe after crew flooded the reactor with sea water. Reactor #3 is undergoing this process as this is being written (6:00PM CST/11:00PM GST on March 13th).
Can this cause a nuclear explosion?
No. It is physically impossible for a nuclear power station to explode like a nuclear weapon.
Nuclear bombs work by causing a supercritical fission reaction in a very small space in an unbelievably small amount of time. They do this by using precisely-designed explosive charges to combine two subcritical masses of nuclear material so quickly that they bypass the critical stage and go directly to supercritical, and with enough force that the resulting supercritical mass cannot melt or blow itself apart before all of the material is fissioned.
Current nuclear power plants are designed around subcritical masses of radioactive material, which are manipulated into achieving sustained fission through the use of neutron moderators. The heat from this fission is used to convert water to steam, which drives electric generator turbines. (This is a drastic simplification.) They are not capable of achieving supercritical levels; the nuclear fuel would melt before this could occur, and a supercritical reaction is required for an explosion to occur.
Making a nuclear bomb is very difficult, and it is completely impossible for a nuclear reactor to accidentally become a bomb. Secondary systems, like cooling or turbines, can explode due to pressure and stress problems, but these are not nuclear explosions.
Is this a meltdown?
Technically, yes, but not in the way that most people think.
The term “meltdown” is not used within the nuclear industry, because it is insufficiently specific. The popular image of a meltdown is when a nuclear reactor’s fuel core goes out of control and melts its way out of the containment facility. This has not happened and is unlikely to happen.
What has happened in reactor #1 and #3 is a “partial fuel melt”. This means that the fuel core has suffered damage from heat but is still largely intact. No fuel has escaped containment.
How did this happen? Aren’t there safety systems?
When the earthquakes in Japan occurred on March 11th, all ten reactor cores “scrammed”, which means that their control rods were inserted automatically. This shut down the active fission process, and the cores have remained shut down since then.
The problem is that even a scrammed reactor core generates “decay heat”, which requires cooling. When the tsunami arrived shortly after the earthquake, it damaged the external power generators that the sites used to power their cooling systems. This meant that while the cores were shut down, they were still boiling off the water used as coolant.
This caused two further problems. First, the steam caused pressure to build up within the containment vessel. Second, once the water level subsided, parts of the fuel rods were exposed to air, causing the heat to build up more quickly, leading to core damage from the heat.
What are they doing about it?
From the very beginning, TEPCO has had the option to flood the reactor chambers with sea water, which would end the problems immediately. Unfortunately, this also destroys the reactors permanently. Doing so would not only cost TEPCO (and Japanese taxpayers) billions of dollars, but it would make that reactor unavailable for generating electricity during a nationwide disaster. The sea water method is a “last resort” in this sense, but it has always been an option.
To avoid this, TEPCO first took steps to bring the cooling systems back online and to reduce the pressure on the inside of the containment vessel. This involved bringing in external portable generators, repairing damaged systems, and venting steam and gases from inside the containment vessel. These methods worked for reactor #2 at site one; reactors four through six were shut down before for inspection before the earthquake hit.
In the end, TEPCO decided to avoid further risk and flooded reactor #1 with sea water. It is now considered safely under control. Reactor #3 is undergoing this process.
Is a “China Syndrome” meltdown possible?
No, any fuel melt situation at Fukushima will be limited, because the fuel is physically incapable of having a runaway fission reaction. This is due to their light water reactor design.
In a light water reactor, water is used as both a coolant for the fuel core and as a “neutron moderator”. What a neutron moderator does is very technical (you can watch a lecture which includes this information here), but in short, when the neutron moderator is removed, what happens to the fuel core depends on its design.
An LWR has a design with a “negative void coefficient”. This means that if the neutron moderator is removed, the fission reactor will slow and eventually stop. Some other reactor designs (such as the one at Chernobyl) have a “positive void coefficient”, which means that if the moderator is removed, the fission reaction speeds up and becomes self-sustaning.
An LWR design limits the damage caused by a meltdown, because if all of the coolant is boiled away, the fission reaction will not keep going, because the coolant is also the moderator. The core will then only generate decay heat, which while dangerous and strong enough to melt the core, is not nearly as dangerous as an active fission reaction.
The containment vessel at Fukushima should be strong enough to resist breaching even during a decay heat meltdown. The amount of energy that could be produced by decay heat is easily calculated, and it is possible to design a container that will resist it. If it is not, and the core melts its way through the bottom of the vessel, it will end up in a large concrete barrier below the reactor. It is nearly impossible that a fuel melt caused by decay heat would penetrate this barrier. A containment vessel failure like this would result in a massive cleanup job but no leakage of nuclear material into the outside environment.
This is all moot, however, as flooding the reactor with sea water will prevent a fuel melt from progressing. TEPCO has already done this to reactor #1, and is in the process of doing it to #3. If any of the other reactors begin misbehaving, the sea water option will be available for those as well.
What was this about an explosion?
One of the byproducts of reactors like the ones at Fukushima is hydrogen. Normally this gas is vented and burned slowly. Due to the nature of the accident, the vented hydrogen gas was not properly burned as it was released. This led to a build up of hydrogen gas inside the reactor #1 building, but outside the containment vessel.
This gas ignited, causing the top of the largely cosmetic external shell to be blown off. This shell was made of sheet metal on a steel frame and did not require a great deal of force to be destroyed. The reactor itself was not damaged in this explosion, and there were only four minor injuries. This was a conventional chemical reaction and not a nuclear explosion.
You see what happened in this photo. Note that other than losing the sheet metal covering on the top, the reactor building is intact. No containment breach has occurred.
At about 2:30AM GMT on March 14th, a similar explosion occurred at the reactor #3 building. This explosion was not unexpected, as TEPCO had warned that one might occur. The damage is still being assessed but it has been announced that the containment vessel was not breached.
Is there radiation leakage?
The radiation levels outside the plant are higher than usual due to the release of radioactive steam. These levels will go down and return to their normal levels, as no fuel has escaped containment.
Here is a chart showing the effects of various radiation poisoning levels. For perspective, note that this chart starts at 1 Gy, equivalent to 1 Sv; the radiation outside the problematic Fukushima reactors is being measured in micro-Svs per hour. The highest reported levels outside the Fukushima reactors has been around 1000 to 1500 micro-Svs per hour. This means that one would have to stay in this area for four to six weeks, 24 hours a day, without protection in order to experience the lowest level of radiation poisoning, which while unpleasant is not normally fatal. And this level will not stay where it is.
Also note the chart of normal radiation exposure levels from things like medical x-rays and airline flights.
There have also been very minor releases of radioactive reactor byproducts like cesium along with the steam. This material is less radioactive than the typical output of coal power plants. It is significant mainly as an indicator of the state of the reactor core.
I read that there’s a plume of radioactive material heading across the Pacific.
In its current state, the steam blowing east from Japan across the pacific is less dangerous than living in Denver for a year. If it makes it across the ocean, it will be almost undetectable by the time it arrives.
What’s this about fuel rods being exposed to the air?
When the coolant levels inside the reactor get low enough, the tops of the fuel rods will be exposed to the air inside the containment vessel. They have not been exposed to the external atmosphere and the containment vessels are all intact.
Can this end up like Chernobyl?
No, it cannot. for several reasons.
- Chernobyl was designed with a positive void coefficient. This means that when the neutron moderator was removed, the reaction got stronger. The Fukushima reactors have a negative void coefficient, which means that if you remove the neutron moderator, the reaction slows and eventually stops.
- Chernobyl’s core was built on top of a tank of water. This was meant to cool the core if it melted through the containment vessel. Instead, it caused a tremendous steam explosion which tore the facility apart. The Fukushima reactors do not have this and will therefore not explode like that, even if the core melts through the containment vessel.
- Chernobyl used graphite as a neutron moderator. Graphite is flammable, and when the reactor exploded, the radioactive graphite burned and ended up in the atmosphere. The Fukushima reactors use water as a neutron moderator, which is obviously not flammable.
The news said this was the worst nuclear power accident since Chernobyl, though.
It’s the only nuclear power plant accident of its type since Chernobyl. It’s easy to be the worst in a sample size of one.
Is this like Three Mile Island?
There are similarities. The final effect on the world is likely to be similar: no deaths, minimal external contamination, and a tremendous PR disaster for the nuclear industry due to bad reporting by the media.
How can I keep up with developments?
The western media has been very bad about reporting this event, due to a combination of sensationalist reporting, ignorance, and the use of inexact or unexplained terminology.
One of the safe sources of information is the TEPCO site, which has been posting press releases on a regular basis. Unfortunately, this site is often unresponsive due to the immense traffic it is receiving.
The important thing to remember is that most of the “experts” appearing on the news are engaging in speculation. Very few of them are restricting themselves to what they can be sure about, and those that are have often been misrepresented.
Where can I find more information about these issues?
Reading:
- Timeline and data sheets for the incident by the Nuclear Energy Institute
- Wikipedia on light water reactors and nuclear weapon design
- The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) Systems manual - the Fukushima reactors are BWRs, a subset of LWRs
- More about BWRs
- Tokyo Electric Power Company site with press releases - currently hard to reach due to traffic
Video:
Monday, March 7, 2011
70 Ways to Save Money at the Grocery Store
Got this from a blog. Pretty useful, though not all are applicable to students, especially those whoa re staying at campus hostels or just renting rooms somewhere. But most of it are very helpful. I'm copying it here so that I can always have a reference for myself =)
1. Don't buy frozen. It really racks up your bill, and is high in sodium.
2. Don't buy organic. Organic is a bunch of crap anyways, unless you're growing yourself.
3. Buy fruits and Veggies in Season. They will be more expensive if you don't.
4. Eat something before you go!
5. Try to avoid buying hygiene products. They're typically about 30% higher at grocery stores.
6. Write a grocery list and follow it. Don't let your eyes wander.
7. Stick to the isles you need to walk down. Avoid temptation.
8. Bring a calculator along for the ride. Keep in mind the amount you have to spend, and stick to it.
9. Learn to can your own pasta sauce rather than buying it.
10. Keep in mind that the highest priced items are typically at the level you'd be looking at. Always look up, or down. This is a genius marketing tactic-- so fool the stores!
11. Ask yourself "Do I: Need this? or Just want this?".
12. Cook only meals which consist of ingredients. Don't buy that boxed crap.
13. Don't buy bottled water. Buy a filter. Tap water has more tests ran on it than that crap in the bottle.
14. If you have to buy soda, buy 2 liters. Cans get expensive.
15. Buy in large quantity
16. Pay attention to bins with marked down items inside.
17. Keep prices in mind. Look at local news paper specials and compare prices.
18. Don't go to the store at the last minute. Be realistic, you've got SOMETHING you can cook. (if not, eat grilled cheese or pb&j).
19. Frozen May be a better bet
20. Try to grocery shop online 1 to 2 times a month. It will save you money on gas, and lower your grocery spending.
21. Instead of buying sliced cheese at the deli, look at the alternatives in the dairy isle. Its just as good, and half the price.
22. Find the Most Affordable Store
23. Do not buy more, unless you're completely out.
24. Compare prices by looking at how much you're getting per container
25. Buy the stores generic brand
26. Consider going to the farmers market. The produce is cheaper then a grocery store.
27. Get a basket, rather than a cart. If you get a cart for a small purchase, you're more likely to spend more.
28. Start cutting coupons
29. Look for coupons upon entering the store as well, they're typically by the door just waiting for you to grab them!
30. Buy white eggs rather than brown eggs. They're cheaper.
31. Look for savings in the meat isle. There is typically a discount area.
32. Incorporate more pasta into your diet. Pasta is typically $1-2 a box!
33. Keep in mind what store sells what for cheaper. Shop at multiple stores, rather than one-- to insure that you get the most for your money.
34. Stick to three areas, and three areas only: Produce, Meat, and Dairy.
35. Put down the: candy, cookies, and packaged goodies.
36. Buy ice cream from the schwanns man. Its much cheaper, and terribly convenient.
37. Don't buy premade: potato salad, pasta salad, ect. Just make it!
38. Make bread rather than buying it. A bag of flour costs just about as much as a loaf of bread.
39. Learn to grow your own tomatoes and other veggies.
40. Also, learn to grow your own herbs.
41. Do not buy from the bakery. Instead, bake.
42. Keep your health in mind. Fattening Bad for you foods are normally more expensive.
43. Scope out discount stores in your area. In my area we have ALDO & Save A lot. I buy my spices and pasta from big lots!
44. When things are on sale, by in large quantity.
45. Call companies and ask for coupons, discounts, and freebies. You can often get lucky this way. There are a lot of free things out there, people just don't ask.
46. Skim milk is cheaper then higher percentages. It also has a lot less fat.
47. Stick to poultry rather than beef. The prices are cheaper - and its better for you!
48. Don't buy as many drinks. They add up to a significant part of your bill. Stick to water, juice, and milk. Buy just enough to get by.
49. Buy powdered gatorade rather than bottles. You will save substantially.
50. Learn to make meals out of left overs. You won't have to buy as much food in the long run.
51. Buy frozen juice rather than pre-made.
52. Try to Shop alone. Or with someone whose money conscious. Don't shop with those who add to your bill.
53. Buy a Deep Freezer
54. Make your own lunch meat out of roasts and left overs.
55. Cook in large quantity, and freeze for later. Great substitute for frozen meals.
56. Eat more grains. They're inexpensive and make great side dishes.
57. Carefully look over your receipt. We're all human, we all make mistakes. Just don't pay for other peoples.
58. Don't shop just because you're bored.
59. Take inventory. Make sure ahead of time that you actually need what is on your list. Check refrigerator, and pantry.
60. Get store cards. You will save quite a bit with one of those bad boys.
61. Don't buy grated cheese. Instead, grate it yourself.
62. Understand Unit Prices, and compare prices.
63. Check the day old section in the bread isle. The bread is often discounted up to 50%
64. Try to grocery shop as fast as possible.
65. Don't buy ready to eat salads. Buy a head of lettuce instead.
66. Learn to make your own salad dressing. It tastes better, and its fresh.
67. If you must buy from the deli, ask them to cut items very thinly. A little goes a long way, after all!
68. Try not to buy alcohol.
69. Go to stores that price match. All of that change adds up!
70. Instead of buying canned soup, make your own soup. Make a lot, and freeze it for later.
Interesting, eh? And very true. Practiced some of it myself.
